Welcome to MCQss.com's page dedicated to Stop and Frisk MCQs. This page features a variety of multiple-choice questions related to the legal framework governing stop and frisk encounters.
Stop and frisk is a law enforcement practice involving brief stops of individuals for investigative purposes and limited searches for weapons. Understanding the legal principles, procedures, and controversies surrounding stop and frisk encounters is crucial for professionals in law enforcement, legal fields, and those interested in criminal justice issues.
The Stop and Frisk MCQs on MCQss.com provide an interactive platform to assess and expand your knowledge in this area. Each question presents a scenario, concept, or legal principle related to stop and frisk encounters. By selecting the correct answer, you can test your understanding and receive immediate feedback to reinforce your knowledge.
By practicing these MCQs, you can explore various aspects, including the Fourth Amendment considerations, reasonable suspicion, the scope of searches during stop and frisk encounters, racial profiling concerns, the impact on individual rights, and the balance between public safety and civil liberties. These MCQs serve as a valuable resource for exam preparation, self-assessment, or deepening your understanding of the complexities involved in stop and frisk practices.
A. True
B. False
A. Evasion
B. Time
C. Education Level
D. Noncooperation
A. True
B. Fals
A. True
B. False
A. Yes, but the police will likely have to corroborate the details.
B. No, anonymous tips can never be relied upon.
C. Yes, in the interest of preventing crime, any tip should always be relied upon.
D. No, unless the tipper is willing to come to the scene.
A. True
B. False
A. True
B. False
A. True
B. False
A. Yes, he doesn’t belong in the neighborhoo
B. No, he has done nothing to give rise to reasonable suspicion.
C. Yes, he has offended the residents, which creates reasonable suspicion.
D. No, there is a 24-hour waiting perio
A. Probable cause
B. Judicial authorization
C. A and b
D. A or b
A. True
B. False
A. True
B. False
A. Yes, providing the state had a statute that criminalized the failure to produce identification.
B. Yes, regardless of state law.
C. No, unless the officer knew Allen was involved in the fight.
D. No, even if it was against state law to not produce identification.
A. True
B. False
A. No, not unless Dan, the driver, committed a crime.
B. No, not unless the officer obtains a warrant.
C. Yes, providing the officer had a reasonable belief of dangerousness and the search was limited only to areas where a weapon could be hidden.
D. Yes, providing a reasonable belief of dangerousness, an officer can search the entire vehicle.
A. True
B. False
A. True
B. False
A. True
B. False
A. True
B. False
A. True
B. False
A. True
B. False
A. True
B. False
A. True
B. False
A. True
B. False
A. True
B. False
A. Henry v. United States
B. Terry v. Ohio
C. United States v. Cortez
D. Ornelas v. United States
A. Hunch
B. Preponderance of the evidence
C. Reasonable suspicion
D. Probable cause
A. To check for drugs
B. To check for contraband
C. For the safety of the officer
D. For the safety of the suspect
A. Hunch
B. Preponderance of the evidence
C. Reasonable suspicion
D. Probable cause
A. Wedding ring
B. Cocaine
C. Cell phone
D. Wallet
A. All of these
B. Anonymous tip
C. Showups
D. Lie detector tests
A. Articulable suspicion
B. The reasonable border
C. The actual border
D. All of these
A. All of these
B. Showups
C. Case-by-case determination
D. Photographic lineups
A. False
B. True
A. Self-incrimination
B. Reading of Miranda rights
C. Frisk
D. None of these
A. Informant
B. Fourteenth
C. All of these
D. First
A. 10
B. Plain-feel doctrine
C. All of these
D. 12
A. False
B. True
A. True
B. False
A. A public street
B. The suspect’s car
C. Stop and frisk
D. All of these
A. The king’s law
B. Standard law
C. Stop-and-identify statutes
D. None of these
A. All of these
B. Deterrence
C. anonymous tip
D. hung jury
A. True
B. False
A. Police administrative procedures
B. None of these
C. fundamental fairness
D. case-by-case determination
A. No, one cotenant generally has no right to prevail over the express wishes of another.
B. Yes, the woman is always right in domestic issues.
C. drug courier profile
D. None of these
A. abandoned property
B. All of these
C. informant
D. There is no burden of proof because the case is automatically thrown out due to police misconduct
A. True
B. False
A. None of the above
B. All of these
C. racial profiling
D. Clemency
A. Judicial authorization
B. All of these
C. stop and frisk
D. A or b
A. None of these
B. stop-and-identify statutes
C. No, convictions of any crimes involving dishonesty can be used for impeachment.
D. general warrants