Laws of Arrest, Search, and Seizure MCQs

Laws of Arrest, Search, and Seizure MCQs

Answer these 20+ Laws of Arrest, Search, and Seizure MCQs and assess your grip on the subject of Laws of Arrest, Search, and Seizure.
Scroll below and get started!

A.   The Bill of Rights

B.   The U.S. Constitution

C.   Miranda warnings

D.   Ernesto warnings

2: Which of the following is an example of a situation where a search can be conducted without a warrant?

A.   A person suspected of a heinous murder is spotted entering their home, which would allow the home to be searched.

B.   A person shows up to an informal interview with police, which implies consent.

C.   A person is pulled over by a police officer, and the officer is able to see drugs in the car.

D.   The individual is not a legal citizen, so the individual is not subject to the same protections.

3: Why did the courts find that it is acceptable for police officers to order passengers out of any vehicle they stop, even if there is no suspicion of wrongdoing?

A.   There is a good chance that this will allow the officer to do a Terry stop.

B.   The automobile makes them more likely to try and escape.

C.   The courts tend to find in favor of police.

D.   Statistics suggest they are commonly a threat to the safety of the officer.

4: Patrol officers more likely to perform searches or arrests without a warrant when compared to detectives because ______.

A.   Detectives are less likely to perform searches in general

B.   Patrol officers are not as well-versed in legal guidelines than detectives

C.   Patrol officers are more likely to encounter situations that require quick action to prevent a crime or the destruction of evidence

D.   Detectives are more likely to have close relationships with judges who can sign warrants at a moment’s notice

5: Which U.S. Supreme Court ruling clarified the right to counsel for indigent defendants charged in a capital case?

A.   Argersinger v. Hamlin (1973)

B.   Escobedo v. Illinois (1964)

C.   Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)

D.   Powell v. Alabama (1932)

6: An officer pulls over a driver and smells marijuana. The officer would be permitted to search the car without a warrant because the officer can reasonably conclude that the driver was smoking marijuana while driving. What is this reasonable basis called?

A.   Probable cause

B.   Exigent circumstances

C.   Exceptional circumstances

D.   Due process

A.   The search would not be a permissible warrantless search because the officer was deceptive in gaining consent.

B.   The search and seizure of drugs would be permissible because the occupant gave consent.

C.   The search would only be permissible without a warrant if the hotel clerk had given consent prior to the search and arrest.

D.   Searches of this nature always require a warrant in order to obtain evidence that can be used against an offender in court.

8: Illegally obtained evidence is prohibited from being used at trial due to which of the following?

A.   Probable cause

B.   Exclusionary rule

C.   Exigent circumstances

D.   Reasonable suspicion clause

9: Which of the following can be described as urgent situations that require an officer’s immediate action?

A.   Probable cause

B.   Exclusionary rule

C.   Reasonable circumstances

D.   Exigent circumstances

10: Protections against self-incrimination are guaranteed by which amendment?

A.   Fourth

B.   Fifth

C.   Sixth

D.   Seventh

11: Which of the following would be an exception to the Miranda requirement?

A.   A man is stopped by police and found to be driving under the influence of alcohol.

B.   A person suspected of carrying out a bank robbery is spotted in a gas station and subsequently arrested.

C.   Officers know that a terrorist has planted a bomb, but they cannot find it and they have the suspect in custody.

D.   A suspect in a sexual assault case is arrested at his home.

12: Patrol officers, unlike detectives, rarely have the time or opportunity to perform an arrest with a warrant in hand.

A.   True

B.   False

13: Courts have generally decided that warrants for electronic surveillance require which of the following?

A.   Probable cause

B.   Reasonable suspicion

C.   A hunch

D.   Recognizable danger

14: Michael is testifying before Congress regarding a company he owns that was involved in a massive spill of toxic chemicals. If he wants to avoid answering questions which could incriminate him, which amendment should he plead?

A.   Fourth

B.   Fifth

C.   Sixth

D.   Eighth

A.   Recognizable criminality

B.   Reasonable suspicion

C.   Exigent circumstances

D.   Lesser probability

16: _____ is defined as any written document in which the signer swears under oath that the statements in the document are true.

A.   Affidavit

B.   Unavailable data

C.   Political pressure

D.   All of these

17: _____ is known as the rule (see Mapp v. Ohio, 1961) providing that evidence obtained improperly cannot be used against the accused at trial.

A.   Exclusionary Rule

B.   Motion for recusal

C.   Motion to Suppress

D.   All of these

18: Is exigent Circumstance an instance in which quick, emergency action is required to save lives, protect against serious property damage, or prevent suspect escape or evidence destruction; in such cases, officers can enter a structure without a search warrant?

A.   True

B.   False

19: _____ is in the Bill of Rights, among other protections, it guards against self-incrimination and double jeopardy.

A.   Fifth Amendment

B.   Conflict Model

C.   Consensus Model

D.   All of these

20: _____ is defined as In the Bill of Rights, it contains the protection against unreasonable searches and seizures and protects people’s homes, property, and effects.

A.   Fourth Amendment

B.   Pathological

C.   Both a and b

D.   All of these

21: _____ is known as a procedure in which police ask suspects to submit to a viewing by witnesses to determine the guilty party, based on personal and physical characteristics; information obtained may be used later in court.

A.   Lineup

B.   Risk assessment

C.   Punishment

D.   None of these

22: Is probable Cause a reasonable basis to believe that a crime has been, or is about to be, committed by a particular person?

A.   True

B.   False

23: _____ is suspicion that is less than probable cause but more than a mere hunch that a person may be involved in criminal activity.

A.   Reasonable Suspicion

B.   Touts

C.   Holders

D.   All of these

24: _____ is defined as in the Fourth Amendment, the term refers to an officer’s searching for and taking away evidence of a crime.

A.   Search And Seizure

B.   Police Matron

C.   PoliceWOMAN

D.   All of these

25: _____ is known as in the Bill of Rights, it guarantees the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury, the right to effective counsel at trial, and other protections.

A.   Sixth Amendment

B.   Allen Charge

C.   Civil Trial

D.   None of these

26: Is terry Stop also known as a “stop and frisk”; when a police officer briefly detains a person for questioning and then frisks (“pats down”) the person if the officer reasonably believes he or she is carrying a weapon?

A.   True

B.   False

27: _____ is a document issued by a judge directing police to immediately arrest a person accused of a crime.

A.   Warrant, Arrest

B.   Punish

C.   Supervision

D.   None of these

28: _____ is defined as a document issued by a judge, based on probable cause, directing police to immediately search a person, a premises, an automobile, or a building for the purpose of finding illegal contraband felt to be located therein and as stated in the warrant.

A.   Warrant, Search

B.   Nagged

C.   Gossiped

D.   None of these